S

S. T. A. R. Summary of Ratings

Teacher _____________________________________ Dates ________________

School _______________________ Certification Field _____________________

Ed. S. Committee Mentor ____________________________________

This evaluation represents cumulative assessment of this teacher’s work over a yearlong teaching sequence. The performance criteria are adapted from Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching (Charlotte Danielson, ASCD, 1996) in which the performance criteria are aligned with INTASC standards. Each apprentice teacher is rated on a sale of 1 to 7 (7 being “distinguished” and rarely given). We expect summative Specialist evaluations to fall into the areas between 5 and 7.

Sec. 1: Planning and Preparation	Candidate Self- Assessment Pre-Assessment	Candidate Self-Assessment Post-Assessment	Mentor Assessment
Knowledge and Content
Planning with the Students in Mind
Expectations for Learning and Achievement
Use of Instructional Resources
Designing Coherent Instruction
Assessing Student Learning

Sec. 2: Classroom Performance	Candidate Self- Assessment Pre-Assessment	Candidate Self-Assessment Post-Assessment	Mentor Assessment
Interaction with Students
Climate for Learning
Managing Classroom Procedures
Managing Student Behavior
Organizing Physical Space
Classroom Communications
Oral and Written Language
Using Questions and Discussion Techniques
Activities and Assignments
Providing Feedback to Students
Flexibility and Responsiveness

Sec. 3: Professional Responsibilities	Candidate Self- Assessment Pre-Assessment	Candidate Self-Assessment Post-Assessment	Mentor Assessment
Reflecting on Teaching
Maintaining Accurate Records
Communicating with the Community
Professional Relations
Developing Professionally

Score Tabulation

Candidate Self- Assessment

Pre-Assessment

Candidate Self-Assessment

Post-Assessment

Mentor Assessment

Total Score

Summative Candidate Self Assessment: plus or minus differences_________________